Back in college, when I was the student body treasurer and chairman of the finance board, a Christian group known as Campus Crusade for Christ threatened to sue the university because they wanted to be officially recognized.  The problem was they required that their elected leaders leaders sign a personal “Statement of Beliefs” pledge that included a provision affirming that homosexuality was a sin and the leader did not engage in immoral sexual conduct.

This went against the university’s non-discrimination policy and caused a lot of problems for us.  As a result, the administration did not want the Christian group recognized unless that provision was removed from their by laws.  This led to a lot of meetings with people from both sides and a request that until the matter was resolved, I stopped issuing checks to this group, yada yada yada.

At the exact same time, across the country in California, a law school was going through the same thing.  We resolved our issue in-house.  The folks on the west coast didn’t and they sued.  Their case went to the Supreme Court and was decided this morning, which I blogged about earlier.  I just finished reading the entire opinion in Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California Hastings College of Law v. Martinez.  Here are my conclusions.

My Own Personal Background with a Similar Case

First, you all know that when I went through this, my official position was that any group should be able to discriminate as long as the opportunity to form an organization was open to everyone.  That way, if one group was a “I hate pastries” group, other students could form a, “I love pastries” group and free speech reigned.  The free market of ideas would sort out which group was more popular.  It was a libertarian-leaning position and I thought about it carefully, even calling home to talk to my parents about it for several hours as I worked out my opinion on the matter. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

Kate Gosselin

The abortion rate in America is collapsing steadily over time. That means more babies are being born both in absolute terms and as a percentage of the population base. Overall, this should be good for demographic trends, even if means we have the unfortunate side effect. Exhibit A: Kate Gosselin.

Instead of writing the next chapter of the book I’m working on, as I should be, I am playing We Rule and studying statistics and demographic data from various nations around the world. I’m not exactly sure how this began, but somehow or another, I ended up in databases and that started my research.

What I found was fascinating. Apparently, the per capita and absolute abortion rate in the United States has been dropping like a stone for the past 20 years. In fact, as recent as 2008 (the closest data I could find), total abortions in the United States fell to 1.2 million out of a population of 309 million. Compare that to 1.6 million abortions in 1990 on a population just shy of 249 million.  This according to Stephanie Simon at the Los Angeles Times.

In other words, in 1990, the abortion rate compared to the population base was 0.0064257. Twenty years later, it was 0.003883495. So even though overall abortions fell 25% in absolute numbers, relative to the population, the abortion rate has collapsed by almost 39.56%. That is, relative to the population rate, Americans are having almost 40% fewer abortions today than they were in 1990. Of these, 13% consist of the “morning after” pill which counts as an abortion even if the woman isn’t pregnant and is taking it as a precautionary measure. That means that the real abortion rate is even lower because common sense tells us that not 100% of the women who take RU486 are, in fact, pregnant.

Who Are The Women Having These Abortions?

According to the Kaiser Foundation, 73% of abortions are performed on women 29 years or younger. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

Does Religion Have a Responsibility to Look to Science?

Here’s an interesting question: Does religion have just as much responsibility to examine scientific evidence as it does religious tradition and scriptural text?

Religion and Science Christianity and Science

Responsible religion cannot ignore scientific discoveries. Do you think the Christian church thought they were wrong when they were punishing Galileo? Of course not. But it doesn't change the fact they were.

Put another way: Throughout history, religion taken as a whole has lagged behind scientific discovery and development, only to redefine itself decades, or even centuries, later.  In the case of Christianity, the Bible, specific passages in it, as well as long religious tradition were used to justify:

  • Slavery (not only of whole races but the ability of fathers to sell their daughters, which still goes on in the world and is perfectly biblical)
  • The inferiority of women as evidenced by the prohibition of female preachers and female led households.  Up until the 1970’s, a woman really couldn’t even open a bank account without her husband’s permission in the United States.  That is a staggering thought.
  • The inferiority of different races.  (We’ll talk about this in a moment.)
  • The inability to earn interest on money loaned.  The entire American banking system and economy is directly in violation of biblical teaching.  Every time you put money into a savings account or certificate of deposit, you are earning interest from your share of the interest charged to borrowers, in some case outright usury at 30%+ on credit cards.
  • Child abuse.  There is absolutely nothing un-biblical about requiring 7 years olds to go to work to support the family (almost all of the children in the bible did), rebellious sons and daughters were stoned, and existed more for the benefit of the parents than having any real chance at self-actualization.
  • The torture, imprisonment, and murder of scientists.  We all saw what happened to Galileo for daring to discover that the Earth is not only the center of the universe, it is circling a star, which itself is part of a solar system that itself is circling a galaxy that is circling the center of the universe, which we are nowhere near.

Cognitive Dissonance in the Christian Church

Racism and Christianity

For the longest time, race was probably the most powerful example of cognitive dissonance in the church.  To this day, some misguided religious groups believe that African Americans are the cursed decedents of Cain.

From scientific evidence, however, we know that every human being on the planet started out as black. By extension, for those who believe in a 100% literal interpretation of the bible, Adam and Eve had to be black.  There is no way around the DNA evidence because it shows that humans came from somewhere in Africa, close to where the Jews, Muslims, and Christians believe God created mankind, and that being “white” developed as people migrated north into areas with less sunlight and those with paler skin had the ability to absorb certain nutrients, making them healthier and more successful in a reproductive sense. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Dominion Theology and the United States

Christian Dominion Theology

Those who believe in Christian Dominion Theology for the United States are no different than Islamic clerics that demand Sharia law be followed in everything from banking to personal relationships. The ability for social institutions, such as education and business, to exist separate from religious institutions is one of the reasons the past 150 years have seen the greatest rise in education and the standard of living humanity has seen in its entire existence. A middle class person lives better today than the nobility did hundreds of years ago with access to hot, running water, electricity, furnaces, air conditioning, automobiles, and a rule of law that provides due process.

A few weeks ago, I was reading a political message board where some commentators espoused their sincere belief that all of humanity’s problems will be solved when they succeed in implementing dominion theology.  Intrigued, I began to research the concept.  What I found was frightening.  The only good news is that all mainline Christian religions have rejected dominion theology, although some, such as Focus on the Family, are accused of practicing a “soft” form if it.

In a nutshell, dominion theology is the Christian version of Islamic Sharia law where a group of delusional fanatics takes over the secular government and governs it exclusively by “the law of God”.  The problem is, most of these people have woefully inadequate knowledge of history and fail to realize that one of the reasons the United States has been successful is because we avoided centuries of bloodshed over questions such as whether or not the bread in communion becomes the literal body of Christ or merely represents the body of Christ.

For example, if we were to introduce prayer into public schools, the Christian denominations can’t even agree on what is appropriate or proper.  You’d have Catholics wanting to say a Hail Mary, born again Christians speaking tongues, and Orthodox Christians praying in Latin.  Instead of learning literature, mathematics, history, and philosophy, students would spend all day in fights over whether or not the end times were near.  That’s what families are for – to decide how (and in what) religion to raise their children, ensure that they get what they believe is a “good” foundational understanding of their theology, and then “train them up” in the way they should go.  That is not the purpose of school.  That’s like demanding people memorize the beatitudes at the DMV.  That institution has a specific function that works best if left alone.

In its purest form, dominion theology holds that Christians should own the television networks, elect the government, and write the laws so that Biblical laws are identical to political laws.  Thus, an unfaithful husband would be stoned, as would a gay teenager, rebellious children, and someone who had “heretical” beliefs and dared to question the wisdom of killing productive members of society.

Dominion theology, if it were to ever gain hold in the nation, would lead, unquestionably and inevitably, to some sort of genocide, just as it has in virtually every country where religion has been used as the basis of the court system.  We would have, rather quickly I should think, our own version of “Saint” Thomas Moore burned English peasants for daring to possess a Bible in English, so they could read scripture for themselves.

I am more and more convinced that horsehoe political theory is the most accurate model that has yet to be developed in understanding the role of individuals and institutions in a society.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

The Sin of Sodom and Gomorrah

Discussing the Sin of Sodom at a Family Dinner

After we left St. Louis, I stopped by to visit family and spent an afternoon at my grandmother’s house having dinner, discussing politics, and Christianity in general.  The conversation was great and had many of the same topics that the younger generation of Christians have been discussing on everything from abortion rights to international trade.

One of the things that came up was how often Christians spout scripture that they believe they know, yet have little or no understanding of where it occurs in the Bible, the cultural traditions of the times, or why it’s important in the broader scheme of the historical record.  Most Christians don’t even realize that the Catholic Bible used for thousands of years, and the more recent Protestant Bible that became popular after Martin Luther rebelled against Rome, have different books in them! If you need a reference tool, see this site, which lets you look up every translation for any given verse.

Using the Sin of Sodom as a Case Study

A perfect case study is the story of Sodom and Gomorrah and the often referenced sin of sodom.  Please note that before we proceed, this has nothing to do with the current political debate – I’m not even going to go there right now.  Instead, it is an easy to understand illustration using a story that everyone who grew up in a Christian environment should know and be able to understand instinctively, making it a perfect tool for explaining our criticism with the state of the collective Church in the United States at this moment in time.

The background: In Hebrew, the word Sodom means “burnt” and the word Gomorrah means “a ruined heap” so the names that we now use to refer to the cities must have been given after the disaster and not the original names used by the people who lived there.We also know that Sodom and Gomorrah were not the only cities God destroyed in this manner – Admah and Zeboiim were also destroyed in judgment (see Deuteronomy 29:23).

For thousands of years, the word “Sodomite” literally meant “someone from Sodom”, just as American means someone from the United States.  In fact, the word “Sodomite” didn’t have any sexual connotation until the 13th century when the word came into the English language.  Yes, you read that right … the definition didn’t come into existence until 1,300 years after Jesus Christ walked the Earth. 

I think the worst part is that most Christians are so uneducated they don’t realize that sodomy includes oral sex, including oral sex among married couples (go pick up a damn dictionary). For centuries, man and wife, in the marriage bed, having oral sex was an unspeakable, filthy, abomination that required total repentance thanks mostly to the preaching of St. Thomas Aquinas, who believed that sex should exist only for procreative means.  Modern American culture, however, has conveniently forgotten this definition and now the same Christians that hold signs condemning sodomites go home and commit sodomy a few times a week, talking to friends and family about the holiness of their marriage bed.  It’s baffling people stake their soul on a book that most of them aren’t even willing to read in its entirety (that’s one of the reasons that my freshman year in college, I worked by way through every word from cover-to-cover over the course of eight or nine months).

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!