Over the past 24 hours, I needed to run some fairly intensive server processes for a business that I still oversee myself as it’s mostly automated. I managed to make it so efficient that I turned 21.18 gigabytes of data into 176.9 megabytes of data; a reduction of 99.17%. I still have quite a bit of work to do, as I think I can shrink it even further. The framework was very old, and by re-writing it, consolidating, deleting unnecessary accumulated data, and streamlining the file structure, the results were more than I expected. I’m going to spend the next 4-5 weeks working on it even more, when I have some time, to completely overhaul the rest.
While some of these processes ran, I needed to sit at the desk and watch them, making sure nothing unexpected happened. There was only one near disaster, when I accidentally deleted a navigation module that replicated through everything. I was able to rebuild it, though, and have the restored version redeployed within half an hour. Still, it was a lot of waiting – ten minutes here, twenty minutes there. This meant I had some time when I couldn’t really focus on other things, but my mind was bored. Despite not really reading fiction anymore given my preference for non-fiction, I have a huge set of the the Barnes & Noble bonded leather classics books that I bought en masse a few years ago. For no particular reason, I grabbed Jurassic Park and finished it half an hour ago.
What struck me was how perfectly it encapsulates the dangers of traditional thinking; the non-mental model approach. In case after case, situation after situation, when objections are brought up, the de facto villain of the story, John Hammond, dismissed, criticized, or waived away problems. In fact, I think one could use the book as a sort of homework project to identify several dozen of the big mental models that are necessary to understand the world. Denial. Hubris. Inertia. Shoichi Yokoi Fallacy. The Illusion of Control. Social Loafing. Avarice. Subconscious Assumptions. Morton’s Fork. Superpower of Incentive. Cognitive Dissonance Avoidance. Deprival Super-Reaction Tendency. Probability and Permutation Failures. Stress Induced Cognitive Failure. Autocatalysis. Cumulative Advantage. Overconfidence. Pareto’s Law. Redundancy. Margin of Safety. The list is endless – mental models that both appear explicitly, and mental models that should occur to you implicitly as a result of seeing a situation where they could either cure or prevent what is happening.
An illustration: When questioned about the possibility of monstrously lethal dinosaurs breeding in the wild, Hammond and Wu, the geneticist, are both indignant. They have four failsafes, so they presume it can’t happen. First, the dinosaurs are bred as female. Second, their reproductive tissue is irradiated. Third, the computer system tracks the number of animals in the park. There’s also an escape insurance policy where the animals require a diet rich in lysine or they will go into a coma and die.
[mainbodyad]If the dinosaurs could breed, the results would be catastrophic and uncontrolled. It presents a wipe-out risk for not only the people on the island, but possibly humanity as a whole. Yet, lured into a false sense of security by the systems they had in place, the Jurassic Park facilities had absolutely zero mechanism to deal with the probability, which always remained on the distribution curve. One of the most important lessons from financial and humanitarian crises past is that you should be prepared for the worst case scenario. Assume that everything is going to go wrong. Bank on it. Sooner or later, it probably will. Accepting that fact, and having the integrity and humility to know it is true, is one of the first steps in improving cognition.
It was a very good book. While the film, which I remember seeing back in 1993 when it was first released in theaters, was revolutionary for its time and still holds up well, it fails to capture the truly dangerous nature of Hammond; his disregard for anyone but himself; his refusal to consider problems outside of his limited scope of focus; his doing things simply because they can be done, rather than asking whether they should be done.
Truthfully, though, Jurassic Park‘s film iteration wasn’t the most traumatic, or even memorable, dinosaur movie ever made. That title belongs to The Land Before Time. I also saw that when it was first released in theaters, back in 1988 when I was all but five or six years old. I remember sobbing uncontrollably in the car on the way home because Little Foot’s mother died protecting him. I can still exactly remember what the movie theater lobby looked like, what I was feeling, and my thought process; I realized death was inevitable, and someday I’d have to stand over my own parents’ graves. I was also, paradoxically, happy they had reached the Great Valley, and my tiny little body didn’t know how to handle all that conflicting emotion. If that death scene didn’t break your heart as a kid, you have no soul.
I should not have watched that clip. I need some ridiculous, over-the-top Korean Dramas to cure this sense of loss. I’m watching this one at the moment.
[mainbodyad]
Reader Comments (10)
Comments are presented chronologically, with replies indented beneath the comments to which they respond.


Frankie
November 17, 2013
Out of curiosity, is there a book you recommend that contains a large number of the core metal models? I've seen you reference so many, and assume there must be some major writing on it. Haven't been able to find one to date
joe pierson
November 17, 2013
Replying to Frankie
you know about mungers papers?
http://www.dividendgrowthinvestor.com/2013/11/charles-munger-lesson-on-elementary.html
http://www.rbcpa.com/Mungerspeech_june_95.pdf
Frankie
November 20, 2013
Replying to joe pierson
Thanks for pointing these out, Joe. I sent them to my Kindle for reading this week.
Could you or Joshua comment on "Poor Charlie's Almanack?" I've considered the purchase, but my focus is more general business than stocks.
I also have around 25 other books in line on marketing, management, motivation, loyalty, social psychology, and other topics more relevant to business ownership/management.
Joshua Kennon
November 20, 2013
Replying to Frankie
Buy it. Now. I have half a dozen copies in my library, including an autographed original edition. I'm re-reading the third edition at the moment. Even if you get nothing out of it but 30 or 40 case studies to research given all the historical examples he illustrates, it's worth it.
Frankie
November 20, 2013
Replying to Joshua Kennon
And, it's ordered! Thanks Josh.
While I do enjoy books on my Kindle, my one regret is that I do not build a library which i can loan to friends and visually quickly reference. For the sake of personal use though, Kindle will yield a great result.
Nicholas Archer
November 18, 2013
Yep yep yep
Mario
November 18, 2013
Hi Josh!
Are you familiar with Perceptual Control Theory? I'd love to hear your opinion on this model of behavior.
Joshua Kennon
November 19, 2013
Replying to Mario
Not very. I added it to my reading list; will let you know.
Matt N
November 21, 2013
I've never read this - but it sounds as if the book is MUCH better than the film was. Rather annoyingly, the reading to-do list always seems to grow faster than I can get through it!
Connelly Barnes
July 8, 2015
The main fiction I read is Terry Pratchett. I somehow like the juxtaposition of magical and fantasy elements, farcical comedy, nice prose, and an insightful description of human psychology and errors. I think I like it because real life often appears to have such fantasy properties -- people play out their roles with utter sincerity, but this is frequently amusing, because of all the errors that are being made.
My favorite characters are the wizards (who are this world's professors), who endlessly argue with each other, stab higher level wizards in the back to take over their "pointy shoes," go to long lunches, fall asleep in the afternoon, and occasionally cause paradoxical situations by researching artifacts such as L-space (the space that connects all libraries in the Universe), or the Cabinet of Curiosity ("Technically, it appears to be a classic Bag of Holding but with n mouths, where n is the number of items in an eleven-dimensional universe which are not currently alive, not pink, and can fit in a cubical drawer 14.14 inches on a side, divided by P."), or the Quantum Weather Butterfly.