How Many People Earn More than $1,000,000 Per Year In the United States?

This mail bag question deals with a sub-specialty of the top 1%; those earning more than $1,000,000 per year, or $83,333 per month, often in the form of dividends, interest, and rents.

How many people earn more than $1 million a year in income in the United States? – Pltn8

According to a Wall Street Journal article published on October 25th, 2011 called The Wild Ride of the 1%, in 2007, before the Great Recession, there were nearly 400,000 individuals earning $1,000,000 or more in the United States.

[mainbodyad]In the depths of the recession in 2009, there were still 236,883 individuals who earned more than $1,000,000 in the United States.  We know from other research that, by rough estimates, 90 out of 100 men and women reaching this income level are self-made with little to no inheritance.  Almost all have college degrees.  Men dominate the field, and almost all own or started their own business or work as an executive for a large business.

That same year, it required an income of $380,000 or more to qualify as “the 1%”, which means literally you earn more than 99 out of 100 Americans.  The question of top 1% of net worth becomes trickier, which we discussed in-depth in How Much Money Does It Take to Be in the Top 1% of Wealth and Net Worth in the United States?.

The interesting thing is the level of fluctuation in the income of America’s richest titans.  As the article states:

Though often described as a permanent plutocracy, this elite actually moves through a revolving door of riches, with some of today’s nouveau riche becoming tomorrow’s fallen kings.  Only 27% of America’s 400 top earners have made the list more than one year since 1994, one study shows.”

The bottom line: There are a whole lot of self-made people making a whole lot of money in the United States alone, not to mention the rest of the world.  Making the top 1%, or $380,000 in income per year, is easier than being one of the 236,883 people earning $1,000,000 or more a year.  However, 236,883 is still a lot of people, earning a lot of money.  It’s not like an Olympic gold medalist, where there can only be 1 person standing on the top spot in the podium.  That’s the beauty of our economic system.

The interesting thing is the rise in volatility among the top economic stratospheres has to do with the increasing preference for people to engage in “financialization” of their wealth according to Robert Frank, the author of the Journal piece.  Instead of owning, say, blocks and blocks of townhouses and collecting rental income, people now package the company into a REIT and issue shares on the public markets.  This leads to greater price quote volatility, whereas in the old days, there was no perceived wealth drop, even in a recession, because you weren’t getting daily quotes on your holdings.


  • Tahoebum

    Another fact is not many people make over $1,000,000 for very many years in a row. Often that type of income is only realized just before retirement when people cash in stock, real estate, or other investments. My wife and I have both been working since age 15 and didn’t reach the top 1% until our early 40’s. We will be retiring in a few years at age 52, which puts us in the top 1% of income earners for only a decade and in the top .1% for only a year or two when we realize some capital gains. When we retire, our income will drop by 60% or more. We are part of the stealth wealthy, no fancy cars, boats, houses, or other toys. I drive a Ford and my wife drives a Buick with over 100,000 miles.

  • tony

    not to mention the beauty of having the bottom 40% mean net worth household income being negative ten thousand dollars.

    • tony

      still a good article with nice figuures

  • Steve Engelman

    The reason there are not more on the list is because most people do not believe it is even possible. Well, clearly a lot of people did believe it was possible and therefore they are on the list. First thing you have to do is know it IS possible and other people are already doing it.

    • Patricia Bustamante

      This is very true! Love this statement!

  • Jesse Woolridge

    It should be illegal to earn more then 1 million a year. We would all have much more of everything because the richest 1% has about 50% of all the power and money. I also recommend that it be illegal to pay employee’s then 100 thousand a year, that way nobody would be lacking anything and everyone would be happy finally.

  • Alexander Shekhtman

    Any suggestions what to do if I am living on SSDI? I have a BA in Political Science and Economics and some knowledge in computer programming. Where do I invest money in? What business can I start? It has been hard for me to have full time work due to physical limitations. I would be appreciative for any leads. Thank you. Great article!

    • Justin Nahin

      look at Bitcoin, look at new emerging technolgies! Software really is the way to go, so much profit is involved in this arena if you do it right! I am developing a Bitcoin system here in the United States, we are living in exciting times!

    • Buckshot67

      Be careful-even looking for work -a home business or otherwise can trigger reviews by SSA of your disability status..nearly al income including hme businesses now are reported to the IRS who shares this info with SSA..investing maybe not so much but a small business of any kind that generates any income will be reported and put your benefits in jeopardy..If your actually looking to come off SSDI and work at home, them check with Ticket to work with the VOC Rehab dept in your state and they will actually help you start a home business Including funding and training.

    • wyl5326

      Why not just banned them from using Itemized Deductions in doing their taxes and prevent them from using Tax Loopholes use by Warren and others who should be limited to Standard Deductions like most of us who don’t use those Loopholes that Sen. Joh Edwards used for his wealthy Clients as he prepares their Taxes for them ! I have used Itemized Deductions was well as Standard deductions without Software tools before and found the difference is really Substantial for the wealthy but not for most of us which I find not worth the hassle with the AMT. So I used Standard now and willingly pay 15% in the tax bracket without doing the AMT anymore ! I don’t even bother to deduct Charitable contributions which I still continue to give substantially and don’t ask for receipt anymore !